[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CROSSPOSTINGS (was: Re: maize in Europe and India: a twisted tale
- Subject: CROSSPOSTINGS (was: Re: maize in Europe and India: a twisted tale
- From: [email protected] (Yuri Kuchinsky)
- Date: 30 Dec 1996 17:51:02 GMT
- Followup-To: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,sci.bio.misc
- Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, sci.anthropology, sci.bio.misc, sci.archaeology.mesoamerican, bionet.general, sci.agriculture, sci.bio.botany
- Organization: Internex Online (shell.io.org), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Xref: news.missouri.edu sci.archaeology:38883 sci.anthropology:17085 sci.bio.misc:6554 sci.archaeology.mesoamerican:3947 bionet.general:9700 sci.agriculture:14527 sci.bio.botany:3719
[Follow-ups are directed to: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology, and
sci.bio.misc.]
[Newsgroups bionet.general,sci.agriculture,sci.bio.botany, and
sci.archaeology.mesoamerican have been edited out of the follow-ups line.
This means that readers of these newsgroups will, it is to be hoped, not
see this discussion thread continuing in their groups.]
Peter van Rossum ([email protected]) wrote:
: In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Yuri Kuchinsky) writes:
: >BTW, and who is making these cross-posts now? I have reduced the
: >follow-ups on my original post specifically because some people
: >(including you!) complained about cross-posting. Perhaps it is your lack
: >of familiarity with elementary logic that makes you constantly contradict
: >yourself? Well, the cure is on its way -- just read the following this
: >time.
: I'm starting with this first, because it is a completely baseless
: accusation on your part.
Not.
: YOU STARTED THIS "maize in Europe and India:
: a twisted tale" THREAD YESTERDAY. YOU POSTED IT TO THE FOLLOWING
: GROUPS:
: 1. sci.archaeology
: 2. sci.archaeology.mesoamerican
: 3. bionet.general
: 4. sci.anthropology
: 5. sci.bio.misc
: 6. sci.agriculture
: 7. sci.bio.botany
Correct. But you completely missed the fact that I DIRECTED THE FOLLOW-UPS
TO A SMALLER NUMBER OF NGS!
I posted my original message to more groups _because the message was
relevant_ to all those groups. Yet, I'm concerned about excessive
cross-posting, and THEREFORE, I reduced the follow-ups.
I don't know why you missed all that. (I noted _specifically_ at the
beginning of that post about the reduced follow-ups.) It may be because of
the limitations of your newsreader software, or it may be because you're
unfamiliar with how headers in Usenet postings work? I'm satisfied that
this WAS NOT _intentional_ widening of cross-posts on your part, as I
originally supposed...
: I followed up and neglected to edit the newsgroups line, but it obviously
: WAS NOT ME WHO STARTED CROSS POSTING THIS THREAD IT WAS YOU. So how
: about you apologize for this one?
Well, I think it's important to reduce cross-postings. Those readers of
other newsgroups who want to follow this discussion can simply read it in
the newsgroups listed in the reduced follow-up line. These ngs are:
sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology, and sci.bio.misc.
Follow-Ups:
References: